Allison Kilkenny: Unreported

Massive new oil plume may have been caused by dispersants

Posted in BP, environment, offshore drilling by allisonkilkenny on May 27, 2010
A handout picture obtained on February 17, 200...

Image by AFP/Getty Images via @daylife

Scientists have discovered a massive new oil plume stretching 22 miles toward Mobile Bay, Alabama. This is the second major plume to be discovered (the first was found underwater). Ironically, dispersants, the stuff that is supposed to coagulate the oil and sink it beneath the surface of the water, may be the culprits responsible for the plumes.

The researchers say they are worried these undersea plumes may be the result of the unprecedented use of chemical dispersants to break up the oil a mile undersea at the site of the leak.

[David Hollander, associate professor of chemical oceanography at the University of South Florida College of Marine Science,] said the oil they detected has dissolved into the water, and is no longer visible, leading to fears from researchers that the toxicity from the oil and dispersants could pose a big danger to fish larvae and creatures that filter the waters for food.

Some versions of Corexit, BP’s dispersant of choice, were banned in the UK more than a decade ago because “laboratory tests found them to be harmful to sea life.” The EPA politely requested BP stop using Corexit — a request the company completely ignored — and now scientists are suggesting this stuff is actually only moving the problem, not resolving it.

I hope I’m wrong, but judging by the amount of chemicals BP is dumping along the coastline, this disaster is going to affect generations of ocean life, and possibly permanently alter the ecosystem.

The first such plume detected by scientists stretched from the well southwest toward the open sea, but this new undersea oil cloud is headed miles inland into shallower waters where many fish and other species reproduce.

Events like this can singlehandedly wipe out entire species of wildlife. The worst part is, no amount of suing BP can bring back this life, or the livelihoods of fisherman. I’m not saying that should exempt BP from prosecution, but realizing just how irreversible this tragedy is really makes the magnitude of the horror sink in.

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Balance said, on June 3, 2010 at 1:40 am

    According to the specifications for the Deepwater Horizon which can be viewed here;

    http://www.deepwater.com/fw/main/Deepwater-Horizon-56C17.html?LayoutID=17

    The rig had a max drill depth of 30,000 feet, according to the wikipedia data they were down to 35,055 feet, however they were only in 5000′ of water with it rated for 8000′ or 10,000′ with an upgrade, so it is possible they had operated out of spec, that data can be viewed here;

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_Horizon

    In the first video of the 60 minutes piece this survivor explains that they were deep on the first well and ended up abandoning it, so wherever that bore is, is the most probable location of an alternative Leak which should be investigated. That information is from this video;


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: